ADVERTISEMENT

Football Recruiting: New Paradigm

I am very encouraged by the recruiting success of our new coaching staff and the turnaround vision that they have sold recruits with success.

That being said, the recruiting game has changed so much that absent a very meaningful uptick in high school recruiting we are likely to continue be at a substantial talent disadvantage despite the clear recruiting uptick.

1) USC, Notre Dame, UCLA, Oregon and Washington will all likely end up with higher ranked high school classes
2) Everyone in the Pac 12 will fare better in the transfer portal than us which is arguably a better talent pool to go after as most of the players are more mature as well as known quantities
3) NIL money will make it very to keep stars that emerge and we will see more Harrison Ingram (basketball analogy) situations where even when we land and sign someone quite that the big guys (UNC hoops in case of Harrison) come in and poach our best players

Net net, to consistently win and not be at a talent disadvantage in football, Stanford must consistently sign and keep top 10-15 high school talent and have a meaningful NIL offer to keep its players. I think we can solve occasional issues via the transfer portal but we will never be USC, Colorado, Oregon,…
  • Like
Reactions: jrka78

Early Transfer Portal Data

Suggests all the early offseason talk was no more than that. Just talk.

It's hard to reconcile because things kicked off with so much hope and optimism. You had David Shaw and Bernard Muir discussing internal changes at Stanford to better utilize the portal moving forward.

Then all of a sudden we land our first transfer portal prospect, LB Gaethan Bernadel, who just so happens to be our first undergrad transfer prospect in over 10 years (the last being TE Konrad Reuland I believe).

A few weeks later we land another undergrad transfer, RB Justin Williams-Thomas. His commitment ultimately didn't stick but the positive vibes of landing a transfer prospect from SEC country was a victory in and of itself.

Troy Taylor gets hired, discusses being more active in the transfer portal at his opening presser, and low & behold a bunch of our coaches are now following dozens of players in the transfer portal. Things were really beginning to look up and for the first time in years and I had genuine hope that meaningful changes were coming to the program to restore the competitive balance at Stanford.

And then... nothing.

No more transfers. Justin Williams-Thomas flips to Cal over an alleged housing issue. And all the players that were being followed closely by multiple coaches and recruiters chose to go elsewhere. When transfer players at enormous positions of need like DT Etinosa Reuben (whose little brother is on the team) or DB Cam'Ron Kelly pick schools in the ACC over Stanford such as Virginia and Georgia Tech, that's one thing. But when you start losing guys like LB Julien Simon to Tulsa or QB Sam Huard to Cal Poly, it becomes harder to comprehend.

Whether this is an admissions-related problem or a recruiting problem, the point remains; things aren't getting any better according to the early returns. Given the vast array of transfer portal players on our coaching staff's radar, I thought for sure we'd pull in a good 2-3 other FBS transfers besides Bernadel. Even Shaw himself said that if we could get 5-6 players annually, that would be a big win for this program. Instead, we sit here today with just ONE FBS transfer. Yes, I recognize that we also nabbed Mayberry and Bank from the Ivies but that's such an enormous jump in competition that it's not realistic to expect them to be instant contributors (let alone at a high level).

With just one FBS transfer on the roster, we now have the same amount of transfers that we did last year (Fields). And two years before that (Sanders). In other words, the one-way portal is still a one-way portal. And as long as things keep trending in that direction, I really do believe that this football program will eventually wither away and die. I sincerely hope there's more reason for optimism than the early returns suggest but I am struggling to find any.

_
  • Like
Reactions: BenParker and JRMV

Stanford logo updated by Rivals

Hey guys, some of you would have eventually noticed this change, but just so everybody knows: Rivals has updated the Stanford logo in the database. So, now we have the current logo in use with the white tree instead of the classic Block S and green tree. Both logos were in use before the update was made. A request was made to make sure our logos are up to date with our schools and I followed through.

Football On origins

Rocky posted this on granddaddy origins on TOS... thought those here who similarly started out with the Bootleg of the 1990's going back to it's printed paper and faxed roots would enjoy this bit of retrospective... and those here who came after it went internet and the rise here of Rivals CSR would like to learn something of this and the Booty's original and sometime 'convivial conclave' DNA

https://stanfordmag.org/contents/gridiron-gadflies

Thanks to Jim and Lars for kicking this off as a labor of love thereby filling this great (addictive) need in our lives!

Director's Cup

Apparently no one noticed that we just won the Director's Cup.

You folks do know that the Director's Cup recognizes the best athletic program in the land - right?

You do know that we won it by beating Texas, our current main rival? You do know that we have 7K undergrads and they have 40K undergrads?

I'm certain that if, say, USC or UCLA had won it, their fans would have been ecstatic. No reason to speculate on Cal fans because that's never gonna happen
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT