Interesting data-visualization from Synergy Sports:
It suggests that Stanford's slightly more efficient than average on fast breaks, but that it's a very low-volume fast-break team. That's unfortunate, because -- by and large -- the team has a lot of good athletes (Davis, da Silva, Okpala, even Travis and Humphrey) who should thrive on the break. Something to improve on here.
I suspect Davis's turnover issues are a culprit here.
It suggests that Stanford's slightly more efficient than average on fast breaks, but that it's a very low-volume fast-break team. That's unfortunate, because -- by and large -- the team has a lot of good athletes (Davis, da Silva, Okpala, even Travis and Humphrey) who should thrive on the break. Something to improve on here.
I suspect Davis's turnover issues are a culprit here.
