The Daily has new posts predicting next year's starters. Ordinarily, I'd say too early, but I sadly see little sign that the staff is still pursuing transfers so maybe not.
Here are their predictions:
QB: Brown
RB1: Ford
RB2: Davis
WR1: Mosley
WR2: Hall
WR3: Pantelis
TE1: Roush
TE2: Doyle
LT: Prongos
LG: House
C: Maikkula
RG: Pale
RT: Greer
DL: Rowell
DL: Franklin
EDGE: Bailey
ILB: Galvan
ILB: Rose
EDGE: Tafiti
CB1: Wright
CB: Washington
NB: Neal
S: Sumlin
S: Green
My reactions:
(1) that would be a worse opening day OL than last year, but I could see them going with youth (House & Greer) over alternatives (Leyrer, Anderson). Maybe Hoitink beats out House.
(2) I dunno about Rowell beating out Buckey and Patterson.
(3) Depressingly, there are just not that many moving pieces on our roster. Too little competition
The off-season: Predicting Stanford football’s 2025 defensive starters
Senior staff writer Kaushik Sampath previews Stanford football's 2025 defensive starters, providing a position-by-position breakdown with insights on key returning players and transfers.
stanforddaily.com
Predicting Stanford football's 2025 offensive starters
Senior staff writer Kaushik Sampath previews Stanford football's 2025 offensive starters, providing position breakdowns with news on key players and transfers.
stanforddaily.com
Here are their predictions:
QB: Brown
RB1: Ford
RB2: Davis
WR1: Mosley
WR2: Hall
WR3: Pantelis
TE1: Roush
TE2: Doyle
LT: Prongos
LG: House
C: Maikkula
RG: Pale
RT: Greer
DL: Rowell
DL: Franklin
EDGE: Bailey
ILB: Galvan
ILB: Rose
EDGE: Tafiti
CB1: Wright
CB: Washington
NB: Neal
S: Sumlin
S: Green
My reactions:
(1) that would be a worse opening day OL than last year, but I could see them going with youth (House & Greer) over alternatives (Leyrer, Anderson). Maybe Hoitink beats out House.
(2) I dunno about Rowell beating out Buckey and Patterson.
(3) Depressingly, there are just not that many moving pieces on our roster. Too little competition
Last edited: