TT's offense at Sac St was not based on having fast receivers who can "separate."
He had a stud TE who should be playing D1 football (#16) who did most of the damage vs UIW. The passing offense had a combination of routes where the defense had difficulty covering everybody and the QB and receivers adjusted during the play to the defensive holes. It requires a mobile QB who can see the field, extend the play and be a threat to run. I don't see anyone on that team who is running away from the opposing DB's.
The offense marched down the field efficiently over and over, but there were no 60 yard home runs. It looked a lot like our first drive of the game over the past few years - the one where we actually looked decent. Sac State just did it over and over.
Let's hope Myles Jackson is up to the task.
He had a stud TE who should be playing D1 football (#16) who did most of the damage vs UIW. The passing offense had a combination of routes where the defense had difficulty covering everybody and the QB and receivers adjusted during the play to the defensive holes. It requires a mobile QB who can see the field, extend the play and be a threat to run. I don't see anyone on that team who is running away from the opposing DB's.
The offense marched down the field efficiently over and over, but there were no 60 yard home runs. It looked a lot like our first drive of the game over the past few years - the one where we actually looked decent. Sac State just did it over and over.
Let's hope Myles Jackson is up to the task.
